Trustworthy Qualitative Data
2 paragraphs include references APA format
Student response-1 paragraph include references
This week we focused on the nature of qualitative data. Using the program you found in Week 1, engage in a conversation with your course community about one of the following:
- Write some sample interview questions you would use to ask these practitioners. What are the ways these questions could help our understanding of how their program is going?
- Identify some of the ways you would make your qualitative data collection trustworthy and dependable.
As always, if you are relying on someone else’s ideas when presenting yours, you should reference their paper, article, etc. This includes sharing references to your fellow students’ ideas!
Check out our Essay writing services
Trustworthy Qualitative Data
Response Guidelines
- Your Participation: This discussion is an opportunity for you to review the work of other learners to inform your own learning. Your interactions and anything you share should be courteous, succinct, professional, well-written, and organized. Communicating clearly with proper grammar and punctuation will foster more and better interactions with your classmates.
- Your Post: Create a post responding to one of the discussion prompts. Do not create your post as a reply to another post.
- Responding to Peers: As you respond to one of your classmates, please make sure your response is substantive by sharing your professional experiences and helpful thoughts and feedback about ideas they have shared. Try to comment on those where you feel you have the most useful information to share and consider the following:
- How have your experiences resonated with their ideas?
- What can you add to their ideas, building upon the connections you have made to the material so far? Supplement course resources and extend consideration of the topic by including new information or findings from current journal articles, discussing more in-depth critical thinking questions, or providing constructive or corrective feedback or an alternative viewpoint supported by empirical evidence.
