Staff Work Enjoyment
Reflection paper 6
Of the multitude of strategies discussed this week for increasing work enjoyment for staff, what is your favorite/most preferred strategy discussed in this module? How will you integrate this strategy into your supervision practice in the future? What will it look like when you implement it with a supervisee/trainee? Are there any practices discussed that you will avoid in your supervision in the future, and why?
Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site.). Failing to do so will result in point deductions
Check out our Essay writing services
Staff Work Enjoyment
Preferred Strategy: Recognition and Strength-Based Feedback
One of the most impactful strategies discussed this week was the use of recognition and strength-based feedback to enhance work enjoyment. This method not only acknowledges a supervisee’s efforts but also reinforces their unique contributions and professional growth. According to Housman (2021), consistent positive feedback fosters intrinsic motivation and increases employee satisfaction. In my future supervisory practice, I will integrate this strategy by regularly highlighting a trainee’s strengths during supervision sessions. For example, after observing a role-play session or reviewing clinical notes, I will begin feedback with a recognition of what was done well, tied directly to the supervisee’s skill set. This will help build confidence and create a safe, affirming supervisory relationship. Long-term, I anticipate that this practice will enhance trainee engagement, reduce burnout, and foster a more collaborative supervisory environment.
Overemphasis on Corrective Feedback
Conversely, one practice I plan to avoid is the overemphasis on corrective feedback without balance. Solely focusing on what needs improvement may diminish a trainee’s self-efficacy and increase anxiety. While constructive criticism is essential, when not paired with positive reinforcement, it risks discouraging growth.
