Interview Procedure Feedback
Review two of your classmates’ protocols in their unique threads. Provide feedback on their proposed interview procedures. Reach out to one or two classmates to confirm who you would like to have as your peer debriefer.
Improving Structure and Clarity
When reviewing my classmates’ interview protocols, I noticed opportunities to enhance question structure. One protocol used open-ended questions, but the order seemed disorganized. I recommended grouping questions by themes such as background, personal experience, and reflections. This creates a natural flow and helps participants understand what to expect. Clear transitions between questions also reduce confusion and lead to deeper, more thoughtful responses that are easier to code and analyze later.
Ethical and Confidentiality Considerations
In another review, I focused on the ethical components of the interview process. Although the informed consent procedure was outlined, the steps for protecting participant confidentiality needed improvement. I advised including specific methods for securing audio files, using pseudonyms, and storing data on password-protected devices. Addressing these concerns is vital for building participant trust and ensuring compliance with Institutional Review Board (IRB) guidelines for ethical research.
Rapport Building and Peer Debriefing
Building rapport with participants can significantly impact the quality of responses. I encouraged both peers to start interviews with simple, non-threatening questions to help participants feel comfortable. A warm tone and a few friendly questions can set the stage for meaningful dialogue. After giving feedback, I contacted [Classmate A] to be my peer debriefer. Their clear and critical feedback skills will be valuable in reviewing my findings for bias or gaps, increasing the trustworthiness of my study. Peer debriefing also promotes collaborative learning and enhances the rigor of qualitative research.
