Human Enhancement Ethics
3-5 pages not including title page or reference page. do not use AI. must be relevant peer reviewed or scholar references. Please see attachment for Instructions
Check out our Essay writing services
Human Enhancement Ethics
Redefining Ability through Technology
The videos present technology as a transformative tool for people with disabilities. Mind-controlled prosthetics and sensory-enhanced limbs challenge traditional notions of what it means to be “disabled.” These innovations inspire awe and hope. However, they also provoke discomfort. They push us to ask: where does ability end and enhancement begin? As technology reshapes bodies, we must rethink labels like “normal” or “able-bodied.” The boundaries are no longer fixed.
Challenging Norms and Ableism
These advancements highlight how society often marginalizes those who don’t fit a narrow definition of normal. The videos forced me to confront implicit biases I had about ability. By watching how individuals use technology not just to regain, but expand capabilities, I realized that ableism isn’t just exclusion—it’s a failure to imagine different ways of being human. We must embrace diversity, not just tolerate it.
Transhumanism: A New Era?
Transhumanism raises complex questions. While enhancing life and overcoming disability sound promising, I wonder who gets access. Is this future only for the wealthy? If enhancements become normalized, will unenhanced humans be considered inferior? I’m unsure if it’s good or bad. It depends on how we govern access, ethics, and fairness in these advancements. Thoughtful policy and public discourse are critical.
Equity, Identity, and the Future
Technology amplifies existing inequalities. If only certain groups access enhancements, we risk creating new classes of people. These films reminded me of past eugenics movements masked as progress. They urge caution. In imagining the future of disability, we must ensure representation, affordability, and inclusivity. Without this, we risk turning powerful tools into harmful divisions.
