Healthcare Workforce Study
4.1. Introduction
- Restate the purpose of the study and research questions.
- Briefly describe the data collection process.
- Mention the data analysis approach (thematic analysis).
4.2. Participant Demographics
- Describe the characteristics of the participants (number, roles, experience, facilities).
- Example: “The study included 22 healthcare professionals (8 nurses, 6 doctors, 4 administrative staff, and 4 allied health personnel) from Mercy Medical Clinic (n=11) and Johns Hopkins Hospital (n=11). Participants had an average of 8 years of experience in healthcare.”
-
- Summary of Findings: Briefly summarize the key findings from Chapter 4.
- Link to Literature: Discuss how your findings align with or contradict existing research. Reference specific studies from your literature review (Chapter 2).
- Theoretical Implications: Discuss how your findings relate to the conceptual framework you used (JD-R model, Social Exchange Theory, etc.).
- Practical Implications: Provide actionable recommendations for healthcare organizations based on your findings. These should address issues related to employee engagement, turnover reduction, and patient care quality.
- Limitations: Acknowledge the limitations of your study (small sample size, focus on two institutions, self-reported data).
- Future Research: Suggest areas for future research based on your study’s findings and limitations.
Chapter 4: Findings/Results
Check out our Essay writing services
Healthcare Workforce Study
Introduction to the Study
The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences and challenges faced by healthcare professionals in their daily roles. The research questions focused on understanding how professional backgrounds, facility environments, and role responsibilities influence care delivery and collaboration.
Data Collection Process
Interviews were the primary method of data collection, conducted both in-person and virtually depending on participant availability. Each interview lasted between 30 and 45 minutes, ensuring sufficient depth of responses. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to include a mix of roles and facilities. Confidentiality was assured, and informed consent was obtained. All responses were audio-recorded, transcribed, and anonymized to protect participant identities while maintaining the integrity of the data collected.
Participant Demographics
The study included 22 healthcare professionals across two facilities. Specifically, from Mercy Medical Clinic (n=11) and Johns Hopkins Hospital (n=11), participants represented diverse roles: 8 nurses, 6 doctors, 4 administrative staff, and 4 allied health professionals. In addition, their average experience in healthcare was 8 years, ranging from early-career staff to senior practitioners. Therefore, this mix provided balanced insights into clinical and administrative perspectives, as well as the operational challenges of both small and large facilities.
Thematic Analysis Approach
Thematic analysis was applied to the transcribed data, allowing themes to emerge naturally from participant narratives. To begin with, coding was conducted in phases, first identifying initial codes, then grouping them into broader themes. Furthermore, recurring themes included workload pressures, interprofessional collaboration, and facility-specific resource challenges. As a result, this approach provided a rich, nuanced understanding of workforce dynamics. Moreover, it ensured that subtle but critical issues, such as professional burnout and leadership communication gaps, were captured. Ultimately, thematic analysis offered a strong foundation for evidence-based recommendations aimed at improving healthcare delivery systems and strengthening organizational resilience.
