Emergency Collaboration Theories
Include the following information with supportive evidence from your research:
- Summarize 2 interagency collaboration theories that could be applied to managing the emergency communication network in the selected scenario.
- Explain how each theory is appropriate for the scenario. Identify similarities and differences between the 2 theories or their advantages and disadvantages.
- Identify the theory that you recommend as most appropriate for improving communication in this scenario. Based on the elements of the theory, explain how interagency relationships between city, state, and federal organizations in this scenario can become more effective by using the recommended model of collaboration for emergency management.
Cite at least 2 scholarly sources according to APA guidelines.
Check out our Essay writing services
Emergency Collaboration Theories
Theory of Network Governance
The Theory of Network Governance emphasizes collaboration through interconnected networks. Agencies form horizontal partnerships to share resources and coordinate decisions. This theory is appropriate for emergency communication because it reduces duplication of efforts. It also fosters trust and accountability between partners. By creating strong communication channels, it allows agencies to act collectively, ensuring faster and more effective emergency responses.
Contingency Theory of Collaboration
Contingency Theory highlights that collaboration strategies should adapt to the specific emergency context. It suggests that no single communication structure fits all situations. This theory works well in emergencies where conditions change rapidly. Agencies can tailor their communication approaches depending on the severity and type of crisis. It is useful because it provides flexibility, allowing city, state, and federal agencies to align strategies with evolving circumstances.
Comparing the Theories
Both theories aim to strengthen collaboration and communication. Network Governance is more structured and stable, while Contingency Theory is adaptive and flexible. A major advantage of Network Governance is predictability, but it can lack agility. On the other hand, Contingency Theory adapts easily but may lead to confusion without clear guidelines. Both provide unique strengths that can be valuable depending on the type of emergency.
Recommended Theory for Emergency Management
The recommended approach is Network Governance. It ensures consistent communication and trust between city, state, and federal agencies. According to Kapucu and Garayev (2016), network models create resilience in emergency systems. By using this model, agencies can build effective interagency relationships, share information openly, and respond cohesively to crises. A strong governance network ensures clarity, reliability, and accountability in emergency management communication.
